Rebuilding a Paid Media System for a Specialty Auto Parts Retailer with 100K+ SKUs

By Using Google Ads, Google Shopping

Executive Summary

A specialty auto parts ecommerce brand with a catalog exceeding 100,000 SKUs engaged SCUBE after paid media growth plateaued. The business served a mix of retail customers, repair shops, and trade buyers, and relied heavily on paid channels to surface hard-to-find electrical components.

Performance had not collapsed. Spend was moving. But revenue had plateaued. Profit after advertising costs was inconsistent, and reporting did not reflect how demand was actually being captured across the catalog.

The objective was not short-term efficiency gains. The retailer needed a paid media system that could operate with less oversight, support catalog complexity, and scale without quietly leaking margin.

Over the 12 months following a system rebuild, profit after advertising costs increased by $530,000 year over year. Revenue grew 22% during the same period. The improvement did not come from higher bids or broader reach. It came from restructuring how demand was captured, measured, and filtered across channels.

The Challenge

Growth was capped by structure, not budget.

The catalog was large, uneven in performance, and treated as a single entity inside paid channels. High-intent demand existed, but signal quality made it difficult to distinguish which products were creating profit versus absorbing spend.

Measurement compounded the issue. Platform reporting emphasized surface metrics that looked healthy while obscuring margin behavior. Decisions were being made on activity, not consequence.

This combination created a familiar failure mode in large, complex catalogs. Spend scaled faster than understanding. Efficiency held just long enough to hide the problem.

SCUBE’s Approach

The account was treated as a system design problem. The work focused on clarifying signals, separating demand types, and sequencing channels so each served a defined role.

Measurement & Tracking

Tracking was reconfigured to reduce distortion between platform reporting and business reality. Reporting was reoriented around profit behavior, cost of sale, revenue and channel contribution rather than vanity metrics.

The goal was not perfect attribution. It was directional clarity that could support real decisions without constant reconciliation.

Demand Capture & Catalog Structure

Search and shopping programs were reorganized to separate branded demand from non-brand demand, exposing where growth was actually coming from.

The product feed was rebuilt to reflect performance tiers rather than completeness. High-contributing SKUs were isolated. MPNs and brand names were added to titles. Low-yield products were removed from paid paths where pricing, availability, or competitiveness made returns unlikely. 

Spend began following contribution instead of volume.

Channel Sequencing

Google Ads was positioned as the primary demand capture layer. Performance Max was structured to support discovery without collapsing into blended reporting. Microsoft Ads was introduced to capture incremental demand without cannibalizing existing traffic.

Across channels, ROAS functioned as a constraint. It prevented waste, but it did not define success. Stability, contribution, revenue, and profit behavior did.

Results

Over the first 12 months:

  • Profit after advertising costs increased by $530,000 year over year
  • Total revenue increased 22% while traffic quality tightened

The shift was gradual, not explosive. Performance improved as the system stopped amplifying low-value demand and began reinforcing profitable paths through the catalog.

Paid media became more predictable. Decision-making required less interpretation. The system could run without constant intervention.

Operator Perspective

“​​Our ROAS and Revenue are improving and we don't have wasted spend on ads that don't have a return.”
— General Manager, Specialty Auto Parts Retailer

What Changed Structurally

  • Measurement aligned with contribution instead of surface performance
  • Catalog complexity was acknowledged and designed around, not ignored
  • Channels were sequenced to support demand, not compete for credit

The outcome was not a single performance spike. It was a paid media system that could scale without quietly breaking.

We offer free game plans that provide clear KPIs, campaigns insights & a 90-day roadmap.

Get a free SCUBE Game Plan

We offer free game plans that provide clear KPIs, campaigns insights & a 90-day roadmap.
GET your game plan
Lets Talk

See what your catalog and paid media are actually doing

The SCUBE Game Plan is a focused review of how large, spec-driven catalogs behave inside paid channels. It’s designed to surface what’s contributing to performance, what’s masking underlying issues, and where structure is quietly working against you.If there’s a fit, we walk through the findings in a ~60 minute conversation, looking at:

  • where performance is being carried versus created
  • campaign insights
  • which constraints are shaping results over the next 90 days

The goal is a clearer picture of how the system is behaving, so decisions stop relying on averages or assumptions.

request a game plan

Thank you!

We received your information. Our Principal Tom Bukevicius will personally reach out to you to schedule a discovery call.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.